The apparent death in the state Senate of the $200 million ceded lands settlement between the Lingle administration and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs because of a lack of "buy-in" by Hawaiians points up what has become the first rule of Native Hawaiian politics:
Whatever is proposed, many will squawk and Hawaiians will end up with nothing.
While most people in Hawai'i would like to see the indigenous people of the islands fairly compensated for what was taken from them in the American annexation, it's becoming increasingly difficult to find enough commonality of interest among Hawaiians to identify them as a single political or cultural class.
Hawaiians disagree widely not only on the definition of sovereignty and what's due them, but also on the essential question of what constitutes a Hawaiian.
One group suing OHA says only those with 50-percent native blood deserve services and a say, while others would extend equal native rights to anybody with even a few drops of Hawaiian blood.
Some Hawaiians see the Akaka bill for Native Hawaiian recognition as the salvation of their people, while others adamantly oppose the legislation and have helped prevent its passage.
It leaves us to wonder: If Congress passes the Akaka bill and it's signed into law, with whom would the federal government negotiate?
There's nobody who can speak with authority for even a solid minority of Hawaiians, much less a majority. Whatever is negotiated will face the same kind of scattershot criticism that sunk the OHA settlement.
Until Hawaiians come together behind a recognized leadership with an accepted agenda, there's really nothing to negotiate.